Thursday, 5 September 2013

NBA rejects external financial control by CBN & EFCC



THE Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) will not submit to financial scrutiny by any external body, including the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), as proposed by the Federal Government. The proposal was meant to regulate the financial transactions of lawyers, but to give teeth to its stand, the NBA said it has filed a suit challenging the new provision, which now requires all lawyers to report all financial transactions beyond $1,000 to the government as a way of fighting terrorism and money laundering.

Though the body said it is willing to fight terrorism and money laundering, it contended that such effort should not compromise the independence of the Bar. Speaking at their just concluded 53rd Annual General Conference, which held in Calabar, Cross River State, NBA President, Oke Wali (SAN), said the association went to court because, while it does not support money laundering, lawyers would not be blackmailed into submitting to external control. He insisted: “We will not succumb to being regulated from the outside.”

By the policy, every lawyer is expected to report transactions above $1, 000 to the Special Control Unit Against Money Laundering (SCUML) at the EFCC, in line with the Money Laundering Prohibition Act, 2011 and Terrorism Prevention Act, 2011. Section 5 of the Anti-Money Laundering Law states that if a lawyer defaults in reporting his or her financial transactions, the CBN governor is mandated to withdraw his or her license.

“The law is saying what we as lawyers cannot accept,” Wali added. “I cannot understand how the CBN governor will withdraw my license from outside the Bar. It is even also in conflict with our laws on solicitor-client relationship.”

Chile's judges apologise for their actions after coup


The body representing judges in Chile has made an unprecedented apology for the actions of its members under military rule in the 1970s and 1980s.

It a statement, it said that the judiciary at the time had abandoned its role as protector of basic rights.
"The time has come to ask for the forgiveness of victims... and of Chilean society," said the judges.
More than 3,000 people were killed under the dictatorship of General Augusto Pinochet between 1973 and 1990.

The statement by the National Association of Magistrates of the Judiciary comes a week before the 40th anniversary of the coup that brought General Pinochet to power. It said its members, and in particular the Supreme Court, had failed in its duty to protect victims of state abuse.

The magistrates' association acknowledged that the Chilean judiciary could and should have done much more to safeguard the rights of those persecuted by the dictatorship. It said the judges had ignored the plight of victims who had demanded their intervention.Chilean courts rejected about 5,000 cases seeking help on locating missing loved ones abducted or killed by the authorities.
Critics say their usual response was they had no information about their fate.

Chile's current centre-right government has said the country will officially recognise the anniversary of the coup. President Sebastian Pinera said last month that the coup on 11 September 1973 was "a historical fact" and its 40th anniversary should be a time of "reflection." The announcement came after the conservative senator and former president of the Independent Democratic Union, Hernan Larrain, apologised for his party's actions. "I ask for forgiveness," he said. "This is my voice for reconciliation."


culled from
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-23967816

Monday, 2 September 2013

Saudi Arabia Passes Domestic Abuse Ban For First Time



Saudi Arabia has passed legislation aimed at protecting women, children and domestic staff against domestic abuse, a human rights official said on Thursday. The protection from abuse law is the first of its kind in a country that has often been criticised for lacking legislation that protects women and domestic workers against abuse. The law, which was approved during a cabinet meeting on 26 August, came several months after a local charity launched a nationwide campaign to combat violence against women. Under the 17-article legislation, those found guilty of committing psychological or physical abuse could face prison sentences of up to one year and up to 50,000 riyals (£8,600) in fines.

"This is a good law that serves major segments of the society in the kingdom, including women,
children, domestic workers and non-domestic workers," said Khaled al-Fakher, secretary general of the National Society for Human Rights, a government-licensed body.

Previously, domestic violence against women, children or workers was treated under a general penal code based on sharia law. Judges were left to decide according to their understanding of sharia codes, which were seen as permitting mild violence against "disobedient" wives and generally treated domestic violence as a private matter. "We are always in favour of an explicit law that does not need interpretations or personal judgment," said Fakher, whose organisation helped draft the law.

Nigeria judicial system: Endless litigation as an albatross


It has been argued over the years that justice delayed is a clear denial, or better still, an attempt to pervert the whole system. Nigeria, as a nation, no doubt, has a fair share of this situation which watchers in the sector have described as very ugly. Investigations have revealed that instances of abandoned litigations across various levels of the Nigeria’s judicial system abound, due largely to the granting of unnecessary injunctions, the unprofessional conduct on the part of lawyers, judges, corrupt practices, and apparent lack of facilities.

Former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Dahiru Musdapher was once quoted as saying that over 110,000 cases were pending before Federal and States High Courts in the country. This, no doubt, has brought to fore the slow pace that characterizes administration of justice in the country. The former Chief Justice, who said that although there were other notable challenges confronting the judicial system in the country among which is lack of necessary equipment in the Courts rooms, also noted that the development poses grave danger to the judicial system, stressing further that the inability to provide adequate facility has unnecessarily led to the serial granting of controversial adjournments.

In a related stance, a human rights activist and Chairman, Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Ikeja branch, Mr. Monday Ubani posited that the snail speed that characterizes the administration of justice in the country has succeeded in entrenching corruption in the society, abuse of office, and sadly, prison congestion, a development that has turned the prisoners to monsters and ended up demonizing the society when they regain their freedom, while the unlucky ones died in a more dehumanizing and or tragic condition.

Rising to the challenge of human kidnapping scandal in Nigeria

The story of the abduction of human rights lawyer, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), last Friday on the Benin-Auchi Expressway made the front page of major newspapers in the country. No doubt, his personality and popularity as a foremost human right lawyer and a Senior Advocate of Nigeria necessitated the importance accorded his kidnap story. However, the truth of the matter is that the Edo-born lawyer is not the first person to be taken hostage in the state lately. While little or nothing has been heard in terms of kidnap in the core oil-producing states of Rivers, Bayelsa and Delta, where kidnapping started in the country, there has been an upsurge in Edo State. In fact, Ozekhome’s name may not occupy at least the 10th position if a list of the people who have been abducted in the last eight weeks in Edo State is drawn.

The implication is that kidnapping-the taking away of a person against the person’s will, usually for ransom-which used to be an exclusive preserve of the militants in the creeks of the oil-producing states in the Niger Delta, has journeyed to many states of the federation to settle in Edo State, “Heartbeat of the Nation”. Kidnapping is now a big business in Nigeria and what is worrying is how underreported the scourge is; what one reads in the media are simply a very low percentage of the real case of abduction in Nigeria. A friend’s father in-law who is a retired public servant, over 70 years old, he came visiting the UK and simply refused to return to Nigeria. Here is a man who is not only comfortable back home but ALL is children are upper class professionals, he loves his country and he served his homeland, he deserves to rest in his old age and live in peace. He stated that not less than 9 of his friends have either been kidnapped, or have relatives kidnapped and the least ransom paid was N35 million. He even mentioned a case of ransom being paid trough a local Divisional Police Officer (DPO), who advised them not to involve the press.

Friday, 12 July 2013

Kudirat Abiola’s murder: Al-Mustapha, Shofolahan freed

The Lagos Division of the Court of Appeal, Friday, overruled the death sentence handed to Major Hamza Al-Mustapha and Alhaji Lateef Shofolahan on January 30, 2012, by Justice Mojisola Dada of the Lagos High Court in Igbosere.

According to the presiding judge, Justice Rita Pemu “the lower court stroked to secure a conviction by all means.” The appellate court therefore discharged and acquitted the duo of conspiracy and murder of Alhaja Kudirat Abiola, 45, who was shot in Lagos on June 4, 1996.

The three female appellate court justices that discharged and acquitted Al-Mustapha and Shofolahan are Justice Rita Pemu (presiding), Justice Amina Adamu Augie and Justice F. O. Akinbami. Justice Augie was drafted into the panel following the decision of Justice Ibrahim Saulawa who disqualified himself from hearing the appeal.

Al-Mustapha, a former Chief Security Officer (CSO) to the late Head of State, General Sani Abacha, and Shofolahan, a former Personal Assistant to late Kudirat, were both convicted by the lower court for the conspiracy and murder preferred against them by Lagos State. The duo separately filed their appeals 24-hours after they were convicted, contending that the death sentence handed them was unwarranted, unreasonable and a manifest miscarriage of justice.


culled from
Vanguard
http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/07/kudirat-abiolas-murder-al-mustapha-shofolahan-freed/ 

Braithwaite urges free legal representation for indigent suspects


EMINENT jurist, Dr. Tunji Braithwaite, has called for revolution to change what he termed an oppressive system prevalent in the country, especially in the justice administration. Speaking Thursday when the Tunji Braithwaite Foundation (TBF) visited Ikoyi Prisons, Lagos to donate to the inmates as part of activities to mark Braithwaite’s 80th birthday, the legal icon noted that the huge cost of justice has made it impossible for the common man to get it. 
According to him, no democracy in the world would allow a suspect to go to court without legal representation. “No offender should appear in court without government providing legal representation. There used to be free legal aid but that was not even provided by the government. It was provided by a section of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), lawyers who sacrificed their time, energy and finances to assist these oppressed people.  “You see a case of a man charged to court for a minor offence like wandering, according to the wretched system here in Nigeria, such a person could spend years behind bars awaiting trial. We are all witnesses to a government official who stole N7 billion and he was fined less than N1million and set free! What sort of justice is that? Many of those that are walking free are those that are even supposed to be behind bars while many of those in jail should indeed be free. This is the sad aspect of what we have seen today. Justice has been turned upside down. It is out of reach of the common man.” 
He continued: “You will never find Tunji Braithwaite in company of those who are corrupt. Two times, I have been invited to join government and I turned them down. I was arrested by 200 soldiers during the military era and locked up, yet I did not bulge. I have always championed and defended the cause of the oppressed. I defended the late Fela Anikulapo-Kuti and Olabisi Ajala at the risk of my life.”

The Divorce Hotel: Divorce made quick and easy


It is a concept called the ‘Divorce Hotel’ and helps husbands and wives to arrange all the necessary legal documentation to end their marriage over the course of just two days. They meet a mediator and series of lawyers behind closed doors who will split assets, agree alimony payments and arrange visitation rights – all for a fixed fee.

The brainchild of entrepreneur Jim Halfens, who said he spotted a gap in the market in a country where the average divorce can easily run into five figures and take months to complete. “When they leave the hotel, all work is done,” he told Sky News. “The only thing that happens then in Dutch law is that they have to show the agreement to a judge in the Netherlands and that takes a couple of weeks. “They walk divorced out of this door and to make it official takes a couple of weeks.” He uses a number of high-end boutique hotels around the country, including the smart Carlton Ambassador Hotel in The Hague. Sales manager NinkeBons explains that the couples, who often check in together, but mostly choose to stay in separate rooms, are handled with care by the staff. “We treat them as any other guests, we just try to keep a closer eye on them or make sure they are not wandering around by themselves,” she says. “Just as an example – we would normally enquire if a guest enjoyed their stay at the hotel. Well, obviously that’s not very appropriate in the case of the ‘Divorce Hotel.’”

Couples have to apply to use the process and are rigorously screened by the divorce hotel legal team. If the husband and wives are squabbling, or barely on speaking terms, they are deemed unsuitable for the process.
A businessman called Hans spoke to Sky News off-camera about his experience in the hotel. He and his soon to be ex-second wife actually enjoyed the process. “When we were not in the hotel and discussing arrangements, we were going out in the city and having a bite to eat and having a drink and actually a few laughs as well!” One of the mediators who guides couples through the weekend is Anne Marie Van As. She said: “Today, more and more is known about the damaging effects of a fighting divorce especially… on children. “So a concept which binds mediation with a comfortable environment in a relatively short space of time in which a divorce can be finished is a brilliant concept.”

It is also a brilliant concept for TV and the multi-Emmy Award winning Base Productions is pitching a series to television networks in the US, and several are said to be interested. Producer Mickey Stern says rather than a reality TV show (a genre born in the Netherlands) they are proposing a high-gloss documentary series examining couples as they go through the process and how conflicts are resolved as the spoils are divided.
And the obvious potential for expansion into other countries is also being explored by the creator: the US and Germany may be next to experience the check-in check-out road to divorce. The cheap and speedy legal solution is perhaps appropriate for these times of austerity.


culled from
Peoples Daily
http://peoplesdailyng.com/the-divorce-hotel-divorce-made-quick-and-easy/

Boston bombing suspect pleads not guilty


DzhokharTsarnaev
Boston bombing suspect DzhokharTsarnaev has pleaded not guilty on all charges in connection with the April attacks, some of which could carry the death penalty. In his first court appearance, the 19-year-old entered the federal courtroom in Boston in handcuffs, shackles and wearing an orange jumpsuit. “Not guilty,” said the US citizen, whose family hail from Chechnya. He repeated his plea repeatedly as the 30 counts were read out at the arraignment, which lasted seven minutes.

Tsarnaev was arrested five days after the bombing of the Boston Marathon on Monday, April 15. His brother, Tamerlan, was shot dead by police during a city-wide manhunt following the blasts. The courtroom was packed with victims of the bombings, some of whom needed canes to walk. Also in court were many journalists and a few people who identified themselves as friends of Tsarnaev. He is accused of using a pressure cooker bomb – termed a “weapon of mass destruction” by US law – in the attack, which left three people dead and more than 260 wounded.

He is also charged in connection with the shooting death of a campus police officer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology during the brothers’ wild overnight getaway attempt. Seventeen of the counts against him are punishable by the death penalty or life imprisonment. The attacks stunned America with scenes of carnage and chaos at one of the country’s premier sporting events. The bombs were packed with metal fragments to cause maximum damage, injuring about 264 people, with many losing their legs.

http://peoplesdailyng.com/boston-bombing-suspect-pleads-not-guilty

NBA condemns violent clash in Rivers’ Assembly


The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has condemned the violent clash in the Rivers State House of Assembly. It asked the Federal Government and the relevant security agencies to take all necessary steps to urgently resolve the political crisis in the state. The association expressed regret over the turn of events in the state, arguing that the resort to violence was uncivilized and condemnable.

NBA, in a statement issued on Wednesday by its president, Okey Wali (SAN), urged security agencies not to take side with any party in the dispute, but to maintain an unbiased position. It urged all parties to the dispute to explore the judicial option in resolving their differences rather than resorting to self help. “The political differences in Rivers State up and until now, had been in the courts, which was the right and proper way to settle disputes in any civilized society. “But the latest twist of violence is a dangerous dimension that must be condemned very strongly and quickly. “The NBA therefore appeals to the parties to sheath their swords and return to the courts, where they have been, for adjudication of any disputes between them.

“The NBA calls on the Federal Government of Nigeria and security agencies to do all that is lawful in ensuring the restoration of peace and tranquility in Port Harcourt, Rivers State. The rule of law must prevail, and there must be no sacred cows, as nobody is above the law. “The NBA emphasises that the security agencies must not only be above board but must be seen to be above board, in carrying out their lawful duties. “At all times, the interest and well being of the good people of Rivers State must remain paramount,” the NBA said.

http://thenationonlineng.net/new/news-update/nba-condemns-violent-clash-in-rivers-assembly/

NDIC urges judiciary to tackle legal bottlenecks

 Excessive litigations and lack of proper understanding of the distinction between the legal status of the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) as a corporate entity and its role as liquidator have been identified as critical challenges confronting the Corporation in discharging its mandate. The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, Alhaji Umaru Ibrahim, who made this submission in Abuja at the opening ceremony of the NDIC Sensitization Seminar for Appeal Court Justices, said the Corporation had been experiencing the execution of court judgments against its assets over the liabilities of banks in-liquidation, adding that the Corporation had also faced difficulties associated with the recovery of debts owed to failed banks.

Alhaji Ibrahim therefore appealed to the judiciary to address these legal challenges to enable the Corporation achieve its mandate of depositor protection and stability of the Nigerian banking sector. “We recognise that no matter how robust the legal framework operated by the NDIC is, the Corporation cannot achieve much without the cooperation and vital input from the Nigerian Judiciary”, he said.

The NDIC Chief Executive also described the role of the Court of Appeal as a critical arm of the judiciary, given its constitutional appellate jurisdiction over decisions of the State and Federal High Courts where most of the failed banks related cases were being handled. He urged the judiciary and legal practitioners to play their respective roles effectively, which would thereby empower the Corporation to discharge its mandate in the interest of depositors and the Nigerian banking system.

Rhodes-Vivours’ kidnap: Are judges at risk?

Chief Anthony Idigbe (SAN) writes that judges may now be under more pressure following the kidnap and release of wife, daughter and driver of Supreme Court Justice Bode Rhodes-Vivour. He also suggested ways to end kidnapping.

What is the fate of the judiciary given recent kidnap of the wife and daughter of Supreme Court judge Hon. Justice Bode Rhodes-Vivour? 
It is really unfortunate what has happened to Mrs Adedoyin Rhodes-Vivour and her daughter. She is such a decent, nice and humble lady. So also is her husband. They do not deserve this sort of encounter or experience but neither does any resident or citizen of Nigeria. The malaise is with us all. The father of one of my partners was kidnapped over two years ago and has not been found till today. We have used all our contacts to no avail. My law clerk was kidnapped about three weeks ago in a case of what turned out to be mistaken identity. The kidnappers thought he was the manager of the petrol station where he stopped to buy bread on his way home. He was lucky. He was released after a few hours seriously battered and after all the money in his account was withdrawn using his ATM card. Our family friends’ in-law a former deputy governor was kidnapped and killed recently. It just goes on and on.

The judiciary was already under a lot of pressure even before kidnapping became rampart. The challenges of the judiciary include inadequate infrastructure, inadequate compensation, weak manpower, corruption, undue interference, inadequate security for judicial officers, blackmail of judicial officers, etc. The incidence of kidnap of judicial officers and or their family members has added an ever more urgent dimension to the pressure on the judiciary in its effort to deliver efficient and effective justice to the people. It is the responsibility of government to provide security and rule of law to all in Nigeria. This requires government to create adequate and conducive environment for job creation as well as maintain a justice and rule of law infrastructure that eliminates impunity. Government still needs to do more on the twin issues of job creation and elimination of impunity in our society. We cannot just leave the matter to the good conscience of kidnappers and hope that they will have a change of heart some day and leave what has become for them a “business” nor can we hope that others would in good conscience not join the “business”.

Thursday, 11 July 2013

Young lawyers’ welfare should be NBA’s greatest concern – Akintola



My interest in the affairs of the Nigerian Bar Association
Right from the time I became a lawyer, I picked interest in the affairs of my profession. My local branch can testify to that.
I served in my capacity as an executive and I even rose to the position of Vice Chairman, and at the nick of time I was to become the substantive Chairman before the association went into limbo. Beyond that, after the Port Harcourt debacle, I was one of the very few ones who midwife the coming back of the Bar, as a member of the Conference of Chairmen and Secretaries.
I was actively involved.  In 1998, during the dark days of Abacha, I remember our Chairman, I mean the Chairman of Conference of Chairmen and Secretaries, Chief Awomolo (SAN). He had an office at Ilorin.  From my branch I had to travel there to go and pay, because we had to start registration of the party anew. We had to do a new constitution under Chief OCJ Okocha (SAN), former President of the Bar.  Since then there has been no going back.
Again, I give God the glory for giving me the opportunity to travel the length and breadth of the country, to ply my trade, that is, litigation.  I am a litigation lawyer, although during some period I had to diversify to explore other areas.  I have been participating in the Bar activities favourably.


Akintola and the NBA kingmakers
We are not kingmakers but stakeholders.  We are stakeholders because we know what has been happening at the Bar.  We know the inner workings of the Bar and I have been a good followers of my seniors, who include Chief Okpoko, SAN, Chief Olanipekun, SAN, Chief OCJ Okocha, SAN, Mr. Olisa Agbakoba, SAN, just to mention a few.
They brought the Bar back from its comatose together with our elders such as Chief Aiku, Ahamba, Alhaji Abdullahi Ibrahim, and so on.  These are the people we’ve been following and pay our dues, honouring them.
So, we feel that if these people have played their parts successfully, nature demands that we too, who have been following them can take after them.  We cannot just be there as onlookers.  We decided, let us go there on the driving seat, and see what difference we can make.

Italian court fines Saipem for bribing Nigerian officials


An Italian court on Thursday found Saipem guilty on charges of international corruption, confiscating assets worth 24.5 million euros and ordering it to pay fine of 600,000 euros.

The case revolved round a company called Snamprogetti which was accused of paying bribes to Nigerian officials to win contracts between 1994 to 2004. Snamprogetti was merged into Saipem in 2008.  Saipem is 43 percent owned by Eni.


culled from
 Punch
http://www.punchng.com/news/italian-court-fines-saipem-for-bribing-nigerian-officials/


NPC urges stiffer penalties for sex offender

THE National Population Commission (NPC) has called on the Federal Government to formulate and review policy that would make it easy for the government to thoroughly investigate and prosecute men who are in the habit of sexually harassing teenage girls so as to put a stop to this deviant behavior. Chairman, National Population Commission, Eze Festus Odimegwu, who made the call while speaking at the 2013 World Population Day (WPD) in Calabar on Tuesday, urged the government to mete out great stiffer penalties for sex offences, stressing that demographic aid health survey shows that adolescent fertility in Nigeria in 2008 stood at 121 live births per 1,000 births.

He said the figures are very high, considering the fact that other African countries have drastically reduced adolescent fertility rate, adding that Nigerian fertility haywires as a result of teenage girls being harassed on daily basis by deviant men.   According to him, such incidence have often times led to unwanted pregnancies, which in turn, lead to population explosion, stressing that unless draconian measures are taken, such heinous crimes would continue to raise its ugly head. He added that the conventional two-year jail term meted out to offenders was not enough to deter other men from committing sex offences. Odimegwu pointed that if government was interested in addressing the problems, it should first of all map out the strategy that would drastically reduce poverty among adolescents.

Meanwhile, to avoid undue interference, Justice Oyejide Falola of Osun State High Court yesterday refused to announce the date for the final ruling on the case of rape instituted by a former National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) member, Miss Helen Okpara, against a traditional ruler in Obokun Local Council of the state, the Alowa of Ilowa-Ijesa, Oba Adebukola Alli. According to Falola, “For two reasons, I will not give a date of judgment because almost a day to the earlier judgment, the media were aware of the date of the judgment; they now started calling my lines and disturbing me. Therefore, this case is adjourned indefinitely for judgment and the date is to be communicated to the parties through hearing notice”.

Justice Falola was unable to deliver his ruling at the last adjourned date following the request by the monarch, through his counsel, Mr. Taofeeq Tewogbade, who applied for extension of time for judgment to allow for further defence on the matter. However, Mr. M. O. Adedokun, a Senior State Counsel from the state Ministry of Justice, who represented the Director of Public Prosecutions  (DPP), insisted that the court should deliver its judgment on the matter. He stressed that the case had gone through a series of adjournments, hence the need for the court to discountenance the application for extension of time.   Adedokun then averred that “the attitude of the defense counsel is an attempt to frustrate the judgment”, and urged the court to dismiss the application in the interest of justice and fairness. But Justice Falola then granted the defence leave to bring up the new issues.

culled from
The Guardian
http://www.ngrguardiannews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=126770:npc-urges-stiffer-penalties-for-sex-offenders&catid=1:national&Itemid=559

$15m Ibori bribe: Court decides ownership Sept. 20

A Federal High Court, Abuja yesterday slated September 20, 2013 to decide the ownership of the $15 million (about N4.6 billion) allegedly offered as bribe to former chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Malam Nuhu Ribadu by the former Delta State governor, Chief James Ibori to stop the commission from investigating him over his alleged involvement in the looting of the state’s fund while he was governor of the state.

The trial Judge, Justice Gabriel Kolawole fixed the date to decide the fate of the Delta state government, which filed a suit seeking the ownership of the alleged bribe money abandoned since 2007, after the
adoption of written addresses by parties in the matter. While adopting his addresses, counsel to the Delta state government, Chief Charles Ajuyah (SAN) argued that the money be returned to the state on the strength of an affidavit, deposed to by EFCC top officials that Ibori offered the money as bribe to the anti-graft agency while he was the state governor.

Ajuyah, who is the Delta state Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, informed the court that the affidavit evidence by Mr. Ibrahim Lamode, now EFCC chairman had proved beyond doubt that the money belong to Delta state government, having been offered while Ibori was in office. The counsel also drew the attention of the court to a statement by Dr. Andy Uba, now a Senator that Ibori used his residence in Asokoro to channel the money to EFCC which was later kept in the custody of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). Ajuyah contended that so far, no individual, group or organisation had laid claim to the ownership of the money outside Delta state government, as all documents in possession of EFCC and the court indicated that the money came through Ibori.

He said Delta state government could not lay claim to the money since 2007 because of the so many cases against the former governor and the fear that money might be used as evidence in court. “Delta State came out at the appropriate time to claim the money because the cases against Ibori had been effectively completed and the fact that the federal government and EFCC had in July last year asked through newspaper publication that anybody interested in the ownership of the money should come forward”, he said and argued that senior citizens of the state, led by chief Edwin Clark had earlier asked that the money be returned to the treasury of Delta State.
 
 
culled from
Peoples Daily
http://peoplesdailyng.com/15m-ibori-bribe-court-decides-ownership-sept-20/ 

Judge’s absence stalls Hijab ban suit


Absence of Justice Olubunmi Oyewole of a Lagos High Court, Ikeja on Wednesday stalled the hearing of a suit challenging the proposed ban on the use of Hijab by female Muslim pupils in public schools in the state.
The suit was instituted by two minors and the Muslim Students’ Society of Nigeria against the Lagos State Government. Oyewole had fixed Wednesday for the parties to report the progress in their bid to settle the matter out of court. The suit was subsequently adjourned till October 28.

The minors – Miss Asiyat Abdulkareem and Miss Maryam Oyeniyi – who are the first and second applicants respectively, are 12 years old and pupils of Atunrashe Junior High School, Surulere, Lagos State.
The minors are suing the government through their fathers – Alhaji Owolabi Abdulkareem and Mr. Suleiman Oyeniyi. Joined as respondents in the suit are the Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Ade Ipaye; Commissioner for Education, Mrs. Olayinka Oladunjoye, and Commissioner for Home Affairs and Culture, Mr. Oyinlomo Danmole.

The applicants, through their counsel, Mr. M Sanni, contended that banning female students from using Hijab on or outside the premises of any educational institution in Lagos State “is wrongful and unconstitutional”. They are urging the court to declare the act as “wrong and unconstitutional as same constitutes a violation of their (the applicants’) rights to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, freedom from discrimination and rights of human persons and right to education.” They are also seeking the court to give an order of perpetual injunction restraining the respondents from “further interfering or infringing in any manner on the fundamental rights of the first and second applicants and other female Muslim students”.

Justice Oyewole had at the previous proceedings on May 27 urged parties to explore an out-of-court settlement of the dispute.  Counsel for the state government, Mr. Samuel Ajanaku, had told the court that the state had yet to file any processes (court papers) in the suit.
 
culled from

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

Afe Babalola: Celebrating golden era of a legal colossus

Chief Afe Babalola (SAN)
CHIEF Afe Babalola, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, remains a household name in the legal circle, not only in Nigeria but also in different jurisdictions.

 To many, the legal luminary epitomizes success, hard-work and resilience, while others see him as a highly cerebral person with passion for excellence, both in the legal practice and other areas of human endeavour.
 Undoubtedly, the legal icon’s name elicits courage and untiring efforts to give back to society as well as to provide a fulcrum for societal sustenance. This, he has, demonstrated through his various philanthropic activities that had become a reference point and endowed him in the heart of many.

 For instance, Babalola was recently declared as “the African Man of the Year” for his contributions to education by All African Students Union with headquarters in Ghana. He initiated Endowment Fund Scheme in the University of Lagos. The yearly income from the scheme provides scholarships to students in the university. He also donated buildings, equipment and scholarships worth several billions of naira.

Before establishing a private university; the Afe Babalola University in Ado- Ekiti, Ekiti State, in 2009, to boost the quality of education in Nigeria, Chief Babalola has always believed in investing in the youths and developing the needy.   He has trained over 1,000 lawyers among whom are Judges, Ministers, Attorneys-General (Federal and State) and has over 14 Senior Advocates (SANs) who have passed through his chambers. As a lawyer of outstanding brilliance, Chief Babalola, still teaches law at his university, even at his age of over 80.

 Incidentally, the revered legal luminary and highest individual taxpayer in Ekiti State had a very humble beginning. His forage to the legal profession was also that of a happenstance and the circumstances surrounding his upbringing could make a best seller in movie industry. Born into a polygamous farming family in Ado-Ekiti, of the present- day Ekiti State, Babalola was introduced to farming at a tender age, by his late father, Joshua Babalola, who bought him a hoe and cutlass, with which he started going to the farm like his father, with one singular goal; to be a full-time farmer. Poised to be a successful farmer like his parents, Afe was enmeshed in farming that he never wanted to hear anything about school, because according to him, “life was complete and fulfilled in the farm. ”

1st conviction for Boko Haram


For the first time since the Jama’atu Ahlis Sunnah Iid Da’awati wal Jihad, commonly called Boko Haram started its campaign of violence in 2009, an Abuja High Court presided over by Judge Bilikisu Aminu yesterday convicted five of its members for acts of terrorism. While the four sect members were sentenced to life imprisonment, a fifth one was lucky to bag only ten years jail sentence, while one Musa Adams was freed.

Judge Bilkisu Aminu, in her judgment, convicted the five Boko Haram members on three of the five-count charge slammed against them by the Department of State Security (DSS). Those sentenced to life imprisonment include Shuaibu Abubakar, Salisu Ahmed, Umar Babagana-Umar, and Mohamed Ali; Umar Ibrahim bagged 10 years, while Musa Adam was freed for lack of evidence.

The six were arraigned in 2011 and charged with the April 8, 2011 bombing of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) office in Suleja, Niger state, where 16 people died and several others were injured. They were also charged with the July 10, 2011 explosions at the All Christians Fellowship, Suleja, killing three and injuring others; the March 3, 2011 explosion at a political rally in Suleja, where three people died; and the May 23, 2011 explosion in Dakwa Village, Bwari, Abuja, killing three policemen. They were equally charged for engaging in illegal training in weapon handling and unlawful possession of weapons for the purpose of engaging in terrorism. The convicts were charged under Section 15(2) and (3) of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Act.

The judge however discharged the convicts on charges relating to the explosions at the All Christians Fellowship and the killing of policemen in Dakwa on the ground that the prosecution failed to provide convincing evidence to support the charges. In relation to the other charges, the judge held that the prosecution led sufficient evidence to prove the guilt of the convicts and freed Adam on the ground that the prosecution failed to link him with the offences.

In relation to the four sentenced to life imprisonment, the judge noted that they, “used explosives meant for blasting rocks for mining purposes, to kill human beings who had done nothing against them. “Human life is sacred. There is no human life that is more sacred than the other. The convicts have shown lack of respect for human life. They deserve to be removed from the society,” the judge held before pronouncing the sentence. In respect of Umar Ibrahim, who got 10 years jail term, the judge observed that by the evidence led by the prosecution, he merely served as errand boy for others, who engaged in the illegal weapons training. She held that Ibrahim was culpable for aiding the illegal trainees as he could have refused to run errand for them if he was not in support of their activities.

Jonathan moves to repeal Land Use Act

In a bid to boost accessibility to land, President Goodluck Jonathan has directed the Presidential Committee on Land Reform to work out modalities for the repeal of the Land Use Act 1978, observing that Nigeria’s economy would not grow without massive investment in agriculture.
 
The Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Akinwumi Adesina, made this known on Monday in Abuja at a summit on Realising the Potentials of Agriculture in Africa, which was organised by the Rockefeller Foundation as part of its centenary celebration. Jonathan noted at the summit that there has been an unprecedented transformation in Nigeria’s agriculture sector, adding that the country must look towards agriculture to feed its people and earn foreign exchange. “Unless we transform agriculture, our economy can’t grow,” he said. “Millions of our people depend on agriculture for livelihood, not oil; we must look elsewhere if we will continue to feed our people. “Agriculture has a new frontier for growth; with abundant land and water resources and vibrant labour force, Nigeria has all it takes to use agriculture as its new frontier for growth.” He added that the country has no reason to be an importer of food items since it has vast arable land and favourable ecology.

Adesina said the presidential committee was tasked to ensure that Nigerians have land titles. According to him, the President wants the Land Use Act removed from the constitution to ensure that Nigerians can begin to have land titles, which can stand as collateral for lending or accessing funds. Adesina also said the Federal Government was doing a lot about land registration, in terms of cadastral survey, mapping and ensuring that anybody who wants lands for agricultural purposes could access it. He disclosed that government would change the labour composition of the country’s agricultural sector by recruiting 760, 000 for agricultural production and processing before the end of the year.

Senate threatens Prisons Service


The Senate Committee on Interior, has called on the Nigeria Prisons Service to do everything possible to end what it described as incessant jail breaks the country to avoid being decentralised.

The committee’s Chairman, Senator Bagudu Atiku, disclosed yesterday during the committee oversight function to the NPS national headquarters, expressing worry that the issue of jail breaks in the country was becoming too many that it requires the Service to urgently think of how to end to it. He said that if Nigerians mounted pressure on the National Assembly, the Senate might consider the decentralisation of the Service as was done to Police.

While commiserating with the management over the death of some of its staff, Bagudu told the management to always open up to the Senate on their challenges. The committee said they were visiting the Service to know it position on a proposal that Nigeria Prison Service should be removed from exclusive list and taken to concurrent list.

Reacting, the Comptroller General, Zakari Ibrahim, said that his agency had discovered that they could not tackle the issue of jail breaks alone, and they have resulted to collaboration between other agencies for sharing of information.

http://peoplesdailyng.com/senate-threatens-prisons-service/

Lawyers oppose scrapping of SIECs


Some lawyers yesterday said they were opposed to scrapping the State Independent Electoral Commissions (SIECs) in the planned amendment of the 1999 Constitution. The lawyers gave their views in separate interviews with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Lagos. They said making the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) solely responsible for the conduct of all elections was breach of the principle of true federalism.
Mr Onyekachi Ubani, Chairman, Nigerian Bar Association, Ikeja branch, urged the National Assembly to drop the idea. “It negates the principle of proper federalism. If you say local governments are under states, the states should be responsible for conducting elections into council positions,” Ubani said. He said that most elections conducted by some state electoral commissions in the past had not lived to the expectations of many Nigerians due to lack of fairness and credibility. Ubani said: “The electoral fraud at that level is very high but scrapping SIECs will not solve the problem. “What we should do is to build strong institutions which would ensure that our elections are free and fair.”

Also, Mr Jiti Ogunye said scrapping the state electoral bodies would entrench a unitary system of government in Nigeria. “It will not strengthen our democracy in anyway. It is an erroneous impression that INEC will conduct better elections for local government areas. “I will advise that we should sit down and have a sovereign national conference where such issues will be discussed and agreed upon’’, Ogunye said.
A former Chairman of NBA, Ikeja branch, Mr Adebamigbe Omole, said making INEC the sole body in charge of elections would lead to more abuses. Omole said: “This will only give the Federal Government more powers to trample on the rights of states like they are doing with the police. “Look at what is happening to Gov. Rotimi Amaechi of Rivers. That is why some governors are clamouring for state police.’’

On his part, a human rights activist, Mr Bamidele Aturu, said Nigerians should be vigilant and defend their votes at all elections. “Scrapping SIECs definitely negates the principle of true federalism. “However, most of the SIECs have been engaging in selection and not election. “So, that is why the lawmakers are concerned; but scrapping them will not solve the problem of election rigging,” Aturu added. (NAN)
Some lawyers yesterday said they were opposed to scrapping the State Independent Electoral Commissions (SIECs) in the planned amendment of the 1999 Constitution.

http://peoplesdailyng.com/lawyers-oppose-scrapping-of-siecs/

Monday, 8 July 2013

Court frees man accused of rape


A 27-year-old tailor in Akure, who abducted, defiled and impregnated a 15-year-old girl, was at the weekend freed by a magistrate’s court sitting in the Ondo State capital after agreeing to marry the girl. Mr. Adeduro Ayodeji, popularly called Ade the Tailor, was said to have abducted, defiled and impregnated the 15-year-old after her mother sent her to him to collect money. The girl said: “When my mummy sent me to him to collect money, he slept with me. I later missed my period.”


The accused was first arraigned on June 18 and police prosecutor Inspector Zakari Ibrahim told the court that the offence was committed on April 14 at about 4pm at 15, Ifesowopo Street, Ondo Road, Akure.
According to the charge sheet, the offence contravenes Section 361 of the Criminal Code, Cap 37 Vol. 1, Laws of Ondo State of Nigeria, 2006. The victim’s father, Mr. Michael Adikwu, a farmer, petitioned the Area Commander, Akure that his daughter absconded from home and efforts to find her proved abortive.
“It was last week I discovered that it was Ade the Tailor, who abducted her, stopped her from going to school and kept her in his home. “Attempts to secure my daughter’s release have not been successful. He has threatened me and my family with cutlass and thugs,” he said in the petition.

Although the suspect was granted bail on the first day of arraignment, the case, however, took a new dimension when the prosecutor told the court at the weekend that the victim’s father had written a letter to withdraw the case. In the letter dated July 5, the girl’s father, who came to the court with his daughter, said he was no longer interested in the case because the accused had agreed to ‘marry’ his daughter. “The reason for withdrawing is that the families of the accused have begged me and promised to take care of my daughter,” he wrote. Magistrate Johnson Adelegan struck out the case.

Lagos CJ warns magistrate against jailing 162 offenders

Chief Judge of Lagos State, Justice Ayotunde Philips
Chief Judge of Lagos State, Justice Ayotunde Philipsption


Lagos State Chief Judge, Justice Ayotunde Philips, has warned the magistrate of the Special Offences Court sitting in Alausa, Mrs. Jadeola Adeyemi, who sentenced 162 persons arrested for minor offences to prison.
The PUNCH Newspaper, in its June 17, 2013 report, observed that the alleged offenders were imprisoned without having any legal representation and adequate time to prepare for their defence. Philips warned Adeyemi to desist from sentencing the offenders to prison, adding that such “convicts” should have been committed to community service with or without imposition of fine.

The Deputy Registrar of the state’s judiciary, (Special Duties, Ikeja), Mrs. O. Okunuga, stated this in a letter responding to a petition by a non-governmental organisation, Prisoners’ Rights Advocacy Initiative. “On the allegations of remanding such convicts in prison alongside hardened criminals, the magistrate has been warned to desist from sending such convicts to jail terms and should adopt imposition of fines and/or committal to community service,” Okunuga stated.

The PRAI, through its director, Mr. Ahmed Adetola-Kazeem, in its petition dated June 7, 2013, alleged that among the 162 inmates were under 18 children, who ought not to be sent to prison for any offence. The organisation also  urged the authorities, including the Chief Judge, to investigate the circumstances under which Adeyemi had imprisoned the alleged offenders. Okunuga said upon interrogating Adeyemi, it was found out that “it is not correct that the convict are under ages”. “Rather, their ages range between 18 and 50 years as per the records of the court,” she said. Okunuga added that there was a human rights unit within the premises of the Special Offences Court, which “gives free legal services to indigent suspects accused of such minor offences.”

Housemaid jailed 28 years for stealing N35m jewellery


Lagos State Chief Judge, Ayotunde Philips
Lagos State Chief Judge, Ayotunde Philips
A housemaid, Mary John, has been sentenced to 28 years in prison for stealing her mistress’ jewellery estimated at N35m. The 30-year-old woman slumped moments after hearing the sentence, hitting her head against the carpeted surface of the court room. The impact shook the walls of the court room, but she was quickly resuscitated and carried out by prison warders.

The convict had been arraigned since September 2012 on four counts of conspiracy, entry, breaking and stealing. Her mistress, Mrs. Esohe Kadiri, a lawyer, said she stole wristwatches valued at N9m, bangles and bracelets worth N10m, diamond set worth N8m, rings worth N3m, chains and pendants worth N5m, and a camera priced at N100, 000, which all totalled N35, 100,000. The theft was said to have occurred in July 2012 at her residence in Victoria Garden City, Ajah.

Kadiri, in her evidence before the court said John took advantage of her travel outside the country to perpetrate the theft. She said she was alerted to the crime by her sister, and after challenging John on phone, she suddenly became incommunicado. Together with three other witnesses- Kelvin Ikeagwe, Francis Ugbem and Inspector Patrick Onu- 34 exhibits were tendered to nail the accused.

John, however, in her oral testimony, told the court she was hypnotised by some men whom she met on the road. She also claimed she was taken to an herbalist’s house where she was told that if she told anyone about her experience, she would die. She said she took the men to her mistress’ residence, and they broke through the burglar  proof door to steal the items.

The magistrate, Mrs. Aje Afunwa, in her ruling however observed that the defendant’s written statement was inconsistent with her oral evidence. She said John had indeed confessed to the crime in her written evidence which the court would admit as true. She said, “In her evidence, she confessed to breaking the door, climbing the house and stealing the jewellery. “I choose to believe more the defendant’s written statement than her oral evidence which is an attempt to shift the blame to another person. I believe her oral statement is a figment of her imagination. “More so, hypnotism or superstition is a phenomenon which is not admissible in law.” She further referred to her demeanor which she said did not show any sign of “one whose eyes had just been cleared of hypnotism.”

Afunwa said John did not show any remorse or regret for her action and hence deserved full punishment for her action. She said, “I strongly believe that the defendant stole the items by herself with the help of another person who is at large. “In view of the rampancy of such a crime where house helps, clerks and servants engage in the stealing of the property of their employer, this honourable court will not be lenient with the accused to serve as a deterrent to others. “I therefore find the defendant guilty on the four counts of conspiracy, breaking, felony and stealing. She is to serve a prison term of seven years on each count, with hard labour, and the terms are to run concurrently for a maximum of seven years. “And probably while serving her jail term, she would have a change of heart and probably confess as to where the jewellery is.”

Igbeke denies complicity in leaked S/Court judgment


Senator Alphonsus Ubanesse Igbeke has dissociated himself from the leakage of a Supreme Court judgment in his appeal challenging the declaration of Mrs. Margery Okadigbo as the senator representing Anambra North Senatorial district. Reacting to a statement from the Supreme Court which linked him to the leaked judgment, Igbeke said that he read the leaked judgment on the internet just like every other Nigerian.

In a statement signed by his Special Assistant, Mr Uchem Obi, Igbeke said he read with palpable shock the widely reported story linking his name with leakage of the Supreme Court judgment in the appeal he brought against Lady Margery Okadigbo. He said he did not conspire by himself or with any person or persons to leak the judgment even as he described the act as irresponsible from which he stood not to benefit anything.
Igbeke said he read the said judgment on the internet as many other Nigerians who first read it and alerted him and therefore rejected any insinuation linking him to its leakage. He also said he was ready to make himself available for investigation, adding that the allegation was the handiwork of his political opponents to devise other means of stopping him from contesting Anambra governorship election.

Last week the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) dismissed five Supreme Court workers and a staff of the Court of Appeal of Abuja Division for their involvement in the leakage of the undelivered judgment in the case of SC 179/2012 Senator Alphonsus Uba Igbeke Vs Lady Margery Okadigbo and 3 others. A statement signed by the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court, Mr Sunday Olorundahunsi gave the names of the affected workers as: Russell Ndenu, Nathaniel Abraham, Olayinka Abiodun, Bada Kayode, Festus Ilurimi and Stephen Izonebi.

The commission also recommended to the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister for Justice, Mr. Mohammed Adoke (SAN) to consider whether the alleged mastermind of the leakage, Senator Alphonsos Igbeke has breached the law for which he should be prosecuted. The commission has requested the justice minister to further investigate the motive behind the leakage and possibly take legal action against Igbeke and Mr Collins Okechukwu for allegedly masterminding the leaked undelivered judgement of the Supreme Court.
Olorundahunsi said that the six judiciary workers were found through investigation conducted internally as well as police investigation to have conspired amongst themselves and allegedly with two outsiders, i.e. Senator Alphonsus Igbeke and Mr Collins Okechukwu to leak the judgment before it was delivered on May 31, 2013. Igbeke had put up a paid advert on page 42 of the Daily Sun of May 30, 2013 alleging that the said judgment had leaked which forced his counsel in the matter, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) to write to the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court to dissociate himself from the publication. He also withdrew his service to Igbeke on the matter.

Olorundahunsi said: “The FJSC considered their act as serious misconduct that runs contrary to Regulation 48 (1)(xi) of the Federal Judicial Service Commission Regulations, Regulation 49 and Regulation 60 (1)(i).
“Their acts are also in violation of the Public Service Rule (PSR) Cap 3 section 4 (030401) and (030416).”

Sunday, 7 July 2013

Supreme Court confirms death sentence for policeman who killed 12-yr-old wife



The Supreme Court yesterday confirmed the death sentence passed on a policeman, Usman Maigari, who strangled  his 12-year-old wife to death for rituals. The apex court upheld the death sentence on  Maigari by the Sokoto State High Court and the Court of Appeal, Sokoto. The apex court, after analysing the parties’ written  arguments, said  that   Maigari acted callously. “To say the least, the appellant displayed a complete disregard for human life, with the archetypal characteristics of a beast dressed in police uniform with which he set about the abuse of that office and had thought he had enough expertise to cover up the dastardly acts with the impunity that went along with persons of such genre, best kept away from human society, especially as he held nothing sacred.”

Maigari was arraigned before the Sokoto High Court on July 13, 2000, charged with culpable homicide punishable with death under Section 221(b) of the Penal Code. He was accused of causing the death of his second wife, Sa’adatu Torankawa (whose age was put between 11 and 13 years) on January 11, 1999 “by strangulating her to death for ritual reasons, then conveyed her corpse and dumped it in a culvert near Janzomo village, along Kajiji-Shagari Road. He pleaded not guilty and underwent trial.

In his defence, he denied killing his wife, saying that she died while he was conveying her to the hospital. He said: “I can remember that sometime in January 1999, my wife Sa’adatu fell sick one night. Then I conveyed her on my motorcycle from Yabo in order to take her to the hospital in Sokoto. “However, after we had passed Milgoma village, she died. When I noticed that she was dead, I put her body in a sack, then conveyed the corpse on my motorcycle and dumped it under a culvert along Shagari-Kajiji Road, near one village called Janzomo.” He also told the court that he hid the news about Sa’adatu’s “ailment” and subsequent death from everyone, including his second wife, Hauwa’u and his deceased wife’s relatives, because he was scared his in-laws could kill him.

At the conclusion of trial, the trial judge, Justice Abbas Bello, found him guilty and sentenced him to death by hanging. He challenged the decision at the Court of Appeal, Sokoto and lost, forcing him to appeal to the apex court. The Supreme Court, in the judgment read yesterday by Justice Mary Peter-Odili, upheld the decisions of both lower courts. The court wondered why the convict, a policeman, chose to keep his wife’s ailment and subsequent death to himself if he had no ulterior motive. The apex court also queried his decision to dump his wife’s body at the car park of the hospital and later, under a culvert, where it was later discovered by passers-by rather than take her to the doctor for medical attention.

The court further wondered how Maigari, not being a medical doctor, concluded that his wife was dead;  and why he chose to dump her corpse under a culvert along the road to rot away, rather than inform her relatives for her to be properly buried. The apex court upheld the evidence in a medical report tendered by the prosecution to the effect that the deceased died from strangulation. “What is sure is that there is enough circumstantial evidence, cogent, compelling, unequivocal and irresistible, leading to the conclusion that the appellant and no other, caused the death of his wife, a young person of between 12-13 years, by strangulating her to death and dumping her corpse in a culvert. “It is also to be said that the proof put forward by the prosecution was beyond reasonable doubt in tragic circumstances, most especially, in the present situation, where the perpetrator of this heinous, animalistic crime is an officer of the Nigerian Police Force, who donned the uniform of state, not with pride and dignity of a law enforcement personnel, but wore the uniform which he was unworthy to be seen in.

“The circumstances are such that I see no redeeming feature available to the appellant and therefore no basis to either fault what the trial court and Court of Appeal did. Rather, this court has no choice but to affirm the concurrent findings of the two courts below, which were supported by the evidence on record and nothing on which a deviation can be hung,” Justice Peter-Odili held. She subsequently dismissed the appeal for lacking in merit and affirmed the conviction and sentencing of Maigari to death by hanging. Justices Mahmud Mohammed, Muhammad Saifullah Muntaka-Coomassie, Nwali Sylvester Ngwuta and Olukayode Ariwoola, who equally participated in the hearing of the appeal, agreed with the lead judgment.

Friday, 5 July 2013

Reps begin constitution amendment, scrap SIECs

 WIDE-RANGING legislative proposals aimed at ensuring good governance and deepening the country’s democracy were made by members of the House of Representatives yesterday as they formally commenced the amendment of the 1999 Constitution.

The highlights of the recommendations presented by the Emeka Ihedioha-led Special Ad-hoc Committee on the review of the constitution following the Peoples’ Public Session entail that the overwhelming influence of state governors over their respective local councils would be drastically curtailed by the time the amendment of the constitution is effected.

The Speaker of the House, Aminu Waziri Tambuwal who received the report of the committee during the plenary session disclosed that the leadership of the chamber would consult with members for possible consideration of the report before they embark on recess in a fortnight.   
 
Under the proposed items which will be deliberated upon in the form of bills, there shall be abrogation of the local council joint accounts to pave the way for a new regime whereby the local councils will receive their statutory allocation from the Federation Account.

To protect the integrity of the electoral process at the local councils and remove partisanship, the State Independent Electoral Commission (SIEC) will no longer conduct council polls.   Instead, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has been vested with that responsibility. The committee recommended a fixed term of four years for local councils and prescribed consequences for denial of appropriation to councils that are democratically elected.
Henceforth, anybody found guilty of electoral offences by any court of laws shall be barred from contesting election at both the state and federal levels, just as there shall be an independent electoral offences commission to handle matters related to elections.

Of note is the recognition of the traditional institutions. Traditional rulers shall be represented in the National Council of State and there shall also be the creation of a state council of chiefs at the state level. And due to the unclear and cumbersome nature of the constitution, those agitating for the creation of more states will have to wait till another time as the lawmakers who corrected the ambiguity on the issue in the constitution ruled out the possibility for now.

Details of the 25 bills referred to the House by the committee for further legislative action are as follows: 

Appeal Court removes Obong of Calabar

CITING lack of due process, the Appeal Court sitting in Calabar yesterday removed Etubom Ekpo Okon  Abasi Otu as the Obong of Calabar. The judgment read by Justice Mohammed Lawal Garba and confirmed by Justice Uzo Ndukwe-Anyawu and Onyekachi Otisi upheld the earlier verdict of a  lower court that due process was not followed and the selection of the incumbent was null and void.
The Calabar High Court presided over by Justice Obgojor Ogar had in a judgment on January 30, 2012, brought by one of the contestants to the Obong stool, Etubom Anthony Ani, declared the process that brought the Obong to the throne as null and void and restrained Otu from participating in any selection for that purpose.

  Justice Ogar restrained the Obong from parading himself as the Obong of Calabar until proper election has been held and also restrained the Etubom Traditional Council, from excluding Etubom Anthony Ani and Mbiabo Ikoneto from any election or selection of an Obong. In an abridged 94 page judgment that lasted for 45 minutes, Justice Garba said, “for the breach of principles of natural justice and the first respondent’s (Etubom Anthony Ani) right to fair hearing, the selection process conducted by the appellants which culminated in the selection and proclamation of the 6th respondent (Otu) by the Etubom’s Council represented by the appellants is hereby set aside.

  “The selection and proclamation of the 6th respondent as the Obong elect of Calabar by the Etubom’s conclave of the palace of the Obong on March 31, 2008 is hereby set aside”.   Accordingly, Justice Garba said, the Etubom Conclave of the Palace of the Obong of Calabar “is hereby ordered to conduct another process of selecting a new Obong of Calabar in which all qualified candidates including the 6th respondent will be given the opportunity to participate in accordance with the provisions of exhibit 1/20 and in strict compliance with the rules of natural justice”.

  However, the appellate court set aside the High Court decision that “the appellants had waived the requirement of capping and induction of an Etubom by the Obong of Calabar into Etubom’s Councils of the Obong’s palace as a qualifying factor to vote and be voted for as the Obong of Calabar in favour of the 1st respondent.”